Andrew Jackson\'s Presidency Bank War and IRA

The issue edge was observed by capital of Mississippi to jeopardize economic stability and served as a monopoly on rudes currency. Jackson explained his decision by negativeing of the swear renewal account declaring that some of the causalitys and privileges possessed by the national savings bank are unauthorized by the Constitution. Jackson is a strict constructionist, and he views the bank as unconstitutional because it was not written in the constitution; similar views as Thomas Jefferson. His situation over against the bank brought him great deal of reproval from power quarters, especially within the judicial and legislative pitchfork. He was viewed to be a monarchical president, using presidential power only to interdict against the bank liberally. Hes displace the power of executive branch to the designate without considering checks and balances that plays into the constitution. First, he shouldve establish within the cabinet and thus releasing a veto to the bank. Yet, check and balances applied to his veto because the legislative branch net gather enough votes to override AJs veto.\nFor me, Jackson shows bravery and intent with his duty as a president. Even though he push the limit of executive branchs power, he shows that he has the determination to protect the citizen of America. His view of the second bank as macrocosm unauthorized and monopolizing on the countrys currency whitethorn be controversial. Yet, as a president, being pronounce and emphasised is crucial of necessary. His intention was not to farm the American good deal; yet hes concern with the power that the bank has and therefore his action was big and in prompt. I full agree with his actions, because president needs to be courageous in making decisions.\nOne destroy act that Jackson make is the Indian removal act. He forced inherent americans (Cherokees) croak from their lands started with the state of Georgia westward. Thousands of large number died; thus its called the footprint of tears. This act was caused because of the friction occurrent between white throng and native americans in Georgia. The whites trust their land and possession in Georgia, reclaiming their land; but the Cherokee protested and took the effect to the U.S. Supreme court. The court, led by John Marshall as Chief Justice estimate the Cherokee, however, AJ forced the native Americans to destine up their land. AJ did sacrifice thousands of native americans, where they died during the migration westward. Yet, he once again shows eagerness and...If you want to see a full essay, rate it on our website:

Buy Essay NOW and get 15% DISCOUNT for first order. Only Best Essay Writers and excellent support 24/7!